![]() Download the product from itself, maybe? But why is it written like there's supposed to be a list? Hm. After a moment of confusion you think oh okay, there'll be a list of links to places I can download it from then. The large, bolded "Click to download" text isn't clickable, like pretty much every other "Click to." prompt you've seen. Imagine you're not the computer savviest person around, how you'd read this. I guarantee you this design would confuse a lot of people. And here, for a product that people may not know they need, it could be a lot fewer. If you don't have that, will some people still rummage around and download your thing regardless? Sure. It's a clear, concise description of what the tool does, who needs it, and why. This is the must-have tool for any Android developers who needs to test geofencing-based apps or just test his app on different locations." ![]() Very early on, the copy says: "Lockito allows you to make your phone follow a fake itinerary, with total control over the speed, altitude and GPS signal accuracy. ![]() Anybody making a product they actually want people to use should have a home page that explains early on the user problem and how the product solves that problem, and then makes it easy for people to get the product.Īs an example, take this Android tool I just downloaded: It's just that some of us are familiar with how fickle users are. Dumped the windows completely and continuing on linux (didnt switch due to linux beeing any better, just windows got worse) and freebsd.) (Disclaimer: 20+ years development in low level windows world, from DRM to reversing malware and writting drivers. I was its user for years (untill I have switched to linux due to some insane microsoft architectural decisions, like manifests and com junk within kernel32.dll) and was installing all the software into sandboxie, my base os was clean as "just installed". You delete programs sandbox directory and all its traces are gone. Far better and much less resource consuming aproach, its resource consumption is just a slight (I am talking about % or two) worse than native software, doing trampoline hook overhead is not worth mentioning, games will run at same speed. ![]() It doesnt use virtualization but rather hooks the APIs and redirects them to "in folder structure" where copy-on-write is used to keep local copy of registry, file system. Sandboxie is far better (or different - for its use case it is better). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |